Smart Meters: An Example of Surveillance Capitalism

by K.T. Weaver, SkyVision Solutions 

Surveillance Eye and CapitalismAn essay preview was given this month for a new book by Shoshana Zuboff to be published in 2017 dealing with the topic of “surveillance capitalism” [1] [2].  Giant corporations supported by government have created a new digital “subspecies of capitalism based in which profits derive from the unilateral surveillance and modification of human behavior.”

“While the world is riveted by the showdown between Apple and the FBI, the real truth is that the surveillance capabilities being developed by surveillance capitalists are the envy of every state security agency.” [1]

Whether it be through “automotive telematics” where your every movement by automobile can be tracked and analyzed or through utility “smart” meters where your activities inside the home can be similarly monitored and analyzed, these peepholes of surveillance into peoples’ lives are multiplying like cockroaches.

Regarding smart meters and quoting from a paper published in 2014 [3]:

“By analyzing smart meter’s data, it is possible to perform ‘consumer profiling’ with an alarmingly high accuracy.  Examples range from how many people live in the house, duration of occupancy, type of appliances, security and alarming systems, to inferring special conditions such as medical emergencies or new born baby.”

“Profiling allows extracting residents’ behavior even without utilization of sophisticated algorithms and computer aided tools.  Murrill and colleagues have shown that it is possible to identify the use of major appliances in a house, by analyzing only a 15 min interval cumulative energy consumption data.  Molina-Markham et al. have shown that with the current general statistical schemes it is possible to identify the usage pattern from AMI data even without the detailed signatures of appliances or previous training.”

“This data is valuable to third parties, from insurance companies to entertainment agencies and government authorities.  Once you have access to the network data in AMI or SG, you will also have access to the customer’s name and address information collected and stored for billing purpose.  Although obtaining detailed information is one of the objectives of SG, the process can backfire when such detailed information is collected and used without the customers’ consent.”

“As the number of smart meters increase exponentially, security issues associated with SG and AMI grow substantially from within the system as well as outside.  Detailed information of customers’ consumption is critical as it can reveal their life style.”

“The price signal and commands received at consumer end are also potential areas for cyber and physical attack for the purpose of espionage, damaging infrastructure or power theft.” [3]

Mining for Gold

Recently, I posted an article at this website that ‘Smart’ Meters Generate a ‘Gold Mine of Data’ for Utilities [4].   In 2014, a Goldman Sachs report referred to a “gold rush,” a race to “vast amounts of data” [5]:

“In connected cities, the U.S. has emerged as a leading adopter of smart meter technology for power utilities, approaching 50% penetration of 150 million total endpoints.  The initial foray into connected cities was catalyzed by over $3 billion in stimulus funding and support for smart grid technology as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Restoration Act.”

“Smart meters and the grid network architecture lay the foundation for further connectivity throughout cities, including smart street lighting, parking meters, traffic lights, electric vehicle charging, and others.”

“As with any gold rush, the early winners from the IoT are likely to be the suppliers selling the ‘shovels’ to make the connections possible and to process the vast amounts of data.  But in the long run, the ultimate impact of this third wave of the Internet depends on the adopters in these proving grounds finding gold in connecting billions of devices into an intelligent network.” [5]

An Unprecedented Assault on Self-Determination

The implications of surveillance capitalism go well beyond the initial serious concerns over invasions of privacy.  As stated by Zuboff [1]:

“The assault on behavioral data is so sweeping that it can no longer be circumscribed by the concept of privacy and its contests.  This is a different kind of challenge now, one that threatens the existential and political canon of the modern liberal order defined by principles of self-determination that have been centuries, even millennia, in the making.  I am thinking of matters that include, but are not limited to, the sanctity of the individual and the ideals of social equality; the development of identity, autonomy, and moral reasoning; the integrity of contract, the freedom that accrues to the making and fulfilling of promises; norms and rules of collective agreement; the functions of market democracy; the political integrity of societies; and the future of democratic sovereignty.”

“We are the native peoples now whose tacit claims to self-determination have vanished from the maps of our own behavior.  They are erased in an astonishing and audacious act of dispossession by surveillance that claims its right to ignore every boundary in its thirst for knowledge of and influence over the most detailed nuances of our behavior.”

“The goal: to change people’s actual behavior at scale … we can capture their behaviors, identify good and bad behaviors, and develop ways to reward the good and punish the bad.” [1]

The writings of Zuboff are consistent with a recent paper from Portland State University and highlighted at this website that ‘Smart’ Meters Represent Industrial Profiteering and Government Sanctioned Surveillance [6]:

“Technology developments have broad applications and implications, but the smart energy grid that is being implemented across the United States and Canada, like the worldwide web, we argue, is being appropriated as part of a design to draw upon higher level data from dwellers (as surplus value) in the service of industrial profiteering and in the surveillance interests of industry and the state.”

With the smart grid, electrical and human energy are merged and converted into commodified units of data with which utilities — and potentially the state — actualize a deeper opening and intrusion of households toward the instrumental interests of economic, social, cultural, and increasingly political control.  These acts of intervention are undertaken in the name of efficiency, environmental sustainability, and household cost savings.”

“The promise of smart meters relies, in one part, on behavioural changes of users, such that demand management objectives are met to offset peak loads and eliminate the necessity of adding more electricity production through expensive power production facilities.”

“Thus surveillance of energy consumption habits, we argue, acts as a mode of disciplinary power that punishes, financially and socially.”

“In the long term, smart metering, and the innovations that are likely to be built upon it, with ever-greater capacities to examine behavioural microdata, represents an assault upon individual, and in its collectivity, social, cultural, and political identity.” [6]


It is clear that surveillance capitalism as described by Zuboff is an existential threat to the individual rights that people have gained over the centuries at considerable sacrifice.  It threatens society as we know it in terms of social relations, politics and governance.  Zuboff fears that citizens are currently losing their rights and freedoms due to “ignorance, learned helplessness, inattention, inconvenience, habituation, or drift.”

Zuboff states that the first and necessary response to an increased awareness of something that degrades and demeans human dignity is indignation.  As Zuboff concluded in her essay [1]:

The bare facts of surveillance capitalism necessarily arouse my indignation because they demean human dignity.  The future of this narrative will depend upon the indignant scholars and journalists drawn to this frontier project, indignant elected officials and policy makers who understand that their authority originates in the foundational values of democratic communities, and indignant citizens who act in the knowledge that effectiveness without autonomy is not effective, dependency-induced compliance is no social contract, and freedom from uncertainty is no freedom.” [1]

In the fight against surveillance capitalism as implemented through utility smart meters and other invasive technologies, I hope that I have helped to raise your level of awareness to these threats and that I have helped raise your level of indignation.  Please do not sit by with inattention or helplessness; take a stand and rebel against those perpetrating the assault upon our dignity and our rights.

Source Material for this Article

[1] “The Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism,” Frankfurter Allgemeine, March 5, 2016, at

[2] Master or Slave?: The Fight for the Soul of Our Information Civilization, by Shoshana Zuboff, anticipated publication in early 2017; refer to

[3] “A survey on Advanced Metering Infrastructure,” by Ramyar Rashed Mohassel,, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, volume 63 (2014); pp. 473 – 484; available at

[4] “Smart Meters Generate a ‘Gold Mine of Data’ for Utilities,” SkyVision Solutions Blog Article, December 2015, at

[5] “The Sectors Where the Internet of Things Really Matters,” Harvard Business Review, October 2014, at

[6] “Smart Meters Represent Industrial Profiteering and Government Sanctioned Surveillance, According to Study,” SkyVision Solutions Blog Article, January 2016, at

Copyright Notice © SkyVision Solutions and Smart Grid Awareness, 2013 – 2016.  Unauthorized use and/or duplication of original material from this site without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.  Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to SkyVision Solutions and Smart Grid Awareness with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Material presented in this article is presented in the public’s interest for non-commercial purposes.  SkyVision Solutions does not imply any exclusive right to preexisting material contained in published works highlighted in this article.

About SkyVision Solutions

Raising public awareness and finding solutions for smart grid issues related to invasions of privacy, data security, cyber threats, health and societal impacts, as well as hazards related to radiofrequency (RF) radiation emissions from all wireless devices, including smart meters.
This entry was posted in Smart Grid, Smart Meters, and RF Emissions and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Smart Meters: An Example of Surveillance Capitalism

  1. Jeromy says:

    Some people see things years or even decades before most of society. K.T., you are one of those people. Thanks for your incredibly prescient work on this critically important subject.

  2. Linda from Naperville says:

    What a good article! All of your writings are exceptional and so important, but this one really touched me. Thank you especially for bringing the eloquence of Zubloff to us. The question is, after indignation, what concrete steps can we take to combat this ever-encroaching threat to our hard-won freedoms?

    • Awareness of the issues is the first step; hopefully content at this website will help you in that respect. This latest article shows that there are broad societal implications for where the smart grid industry and policy makers are taking us.

      At a minimum, opt-out of smart meter to the extent you can even if it requires a fee. The utility typically says there is little concern over smart meters since there are so few opt-outs (generally 1 % of customers). Without greater numbers voicing opposition, little progress is likely.

      I am convinced this is primarily a political issue at this point; we need political change where it is recognized that violation of personal rights is not acceptable. Although there have been several lawsuits across the country at this point on smart meters, none have really been successful to any great extent (and thus the Courts are not protecting us). Depending on the amount of time you have, seek out others in your neighborhood who may be working on opposition efforts. In addition, more calls to the Governor and state or Congressional representatives wouldn’t hurt. One could also contact consumer advocacy groups such as ACLU or AARP.

      A recommended article is:

      Also, listen to the following short video:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s