by K.T. Weaver, SkyVision Solutions
I have previously written a number of articles demonstrating how smart meters are not economically justifiable for broad-based deployments and that the vast majority of consumers will suffer a financial “net loss” with smart meters. [1] In particular, we have seen how families are punished by ‘Smart’ Meters and Time-of-Use (TOU) rates. [2]
A recent reminder of these facts came in the form of a November 2016 radio program from Australia, “Electric Shocks.” [3] Continue reading
In the smart meter-related case of Naperville Smart Meter Awareness (NSMA) v. City of Naperville, a Federal district court entered a final judgment against NSMA and in favor of the City on September 26, 2016. (Case 1:11-cv-09299)


Current guidelines of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and similar organizations are outdated and do not adequately protect us from the hazards of radiofrequency radiation (RF). FCC exposure guidelines only protect against thermal damage despite overwhelming evidence that so-called non-thermal effects also occur. These non-thermal effects are simply unregulated.


The 


